Transit Tech High School
Presentation Rubric
|
|
|
Name: ________________________ |
Teacher: Ms Butcher |
|
Date of Presentation: ____________ |
Title of Work: ___________________ |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Teacher Comments:
Transit Tech High School
Homework Rubric
|
|
|
Name: ________________________ |
Teacher: Ms Butcher |
|
Date Submitted: ____________ |
Title of Work: ___________________ |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Teacher Comments:
Rubric for Immigration Project due February 11th, 2011
|
|
CATEGORY |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
Graphics -Clarity |
Graphics are all in focus and the content easily viewed and identified from 6 ft. away. |
Most graphics are in focus and the content easily viewed and identified from 6 ft. away. |
Most graphics are in focus and the content is easily viewed and identified from 4 ft. away. |
Many graphics are not clear or are too small. |
|
Graphics - Relevance |
All graphics are related to the topic and make it easier to understand. All borrowed graphics have a source citation. |
All graphics are related to the topic and most make it easier to understand. All borrowed graphics have a source citation. |
All graphics relate to the topic. Most borrowed graphics have a source citation. |
Graphics do not relate to the topic OR several borrowed graphics do not have a source citation. |
|
Required Elements |
The poster includes all required elements as well as additional information. |
All required elements are included on the poster. |
All but 1 of the required elements are included on the poster. |
Several required elements were missing. |
|
Attractiveness |
The poster is exceptionally attractive in terms of design, layout, and neatness. |
The poster is attractive in terms of design, layout and neatness. |
The poster is acceptably attractive though it may be a bit messy. |
The poster is distractingly messy or very poorly designed. It is not attractive. |
|
Labels |
All items of importance on the poster are clearly labeled with labels that can be read from at least 3 ft. away. |
Almost all items of importance on the poster are clearly labeled with labels that can be read from at least 3 ft. away. |
Several items of importance on the poster are clearly labeled with labels that can be read from at least 3 ft. away. |
Labels are too small to view OR no important items were labeled. |
|
|
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
|
Introduction (Organization)
|
The introduction is inviting, states the main topic and previews the structure of the paper.
|
The introduction clearly states the main topic and previews the
structure of the paper, but is not particularly inviting to the reader.
|
The introduction states the main topic, but does not adequately
preview the structure of the paper nor is it particularly inviting to
the reader.
|
There is no clear introduction of the main topic or structure of the paper.
|
|
Sequencing (Organization)
|
Details are placed in a logical order and the way they are presented effectively keeps the interest of the reader.
|
Details are placed in a logical order, but the way in which they are
presented/introduced sometimes makes the writing less interesting.
|
Some details are not in a logical or expected order, and this distracts the reader.
|
Many details are not in a logical or expected order. There is little sense that the writing is organized.
|
|
Transitions (Organization)
|
A variety of thoughtful transitions are used. They clearly show how ideas are connected.
|
Transitions clearly show how ideas are connected, but there is little variety.
|
Some transitions work well; but connections between other ideas are fuzzy.
|
The transitions between ideas are unclear or nonexistant.
|
|
Accuracy of Facts (Content)
|
All supportive facts are reported accurately.
|
Almost all supportive facts are reported accurately.
|
Most supportive facts are reported accurately.
|
NO facts are reported OR most are inaccurately reported.
|
|
Sentence Structure (Sentence Fluency)
|
All sentences are well-constructed with varied structure.
|
Most sentences are well-constructed with varied structure.
|
Most sentences are well-constructed but have a similar structure.
|
Sentences lack structure and appear incomplete or rambling.
|
|
Sentence Length (Sentence Fluency)
|
Every paragraph has sentences that vary in length.
|
Almost all paragraphs have sentences that vary in length.
|
Some sentences vary in length.
|
Sentences rarely vary in length.
|
|
Capitalization & Punctuation (Conventions)
|
Writer makes no errors in capitalization or punctuation, so the paper is exceptionally easy to read.
|
Writer makes 1 or 2 errors in capitalization or punctuation, but the paper is still easy to read.
|
Writer makes a few errors in capitalization and/or punctuation that catch the reader's attention and interrupt the flow.
|
Writer makes several errors in capitalization and/or punctuation that
catch the reader's attention and greatly interrupt the flow.
|
|
Grammar & Spelling (Conventions)
|
Writer makes no errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
|
Writer makes 1-2 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
|
Writer makes 3-4 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
|
Writer makes more than 4 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
|
|
Conclusion (Organization)
|
The conclusion is strong and leaves the reader with a feeling that they understand what the writer is "getting at."
|
The conclusion is recognizable and ties up almost all the loose ends.
|
The conclusion is recognizable, but does not tie up several loose ends.
|
There is no clear conclusion, the paper just ends.
|
